People ex rel. W.C.L.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• child’s statements inadmissible under the medical treatment hearsay exception where “nothing in the record . . . would establish that [she] understood, or was aware of, the purpose of the questioning by the doctor”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• W.C.L. v. People
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1984-07-09· cited 39×
• Oldsen v. People
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1986-12-15· cited 34×
• People v. Mathes
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1985-02-21· cited 29×
• State v. Wade
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1993-03-25· cited 18×
• People in Interest of WCL
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1982-08-23

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ohio v. Roberts
  Supreme Court· 1980-06-25· cited 5,425×
• United States v. John Louis Iron Shell, Jr.
  Eighth Circuit· 1980-10-24· cited 419×
• Dallas County v. Commercial Union Assurance Company, Ltd.
  Fifth Circuit· 1961-01-17· cited 168×
• United States v. Milton Edward Bailey
  Third Circuit· 1978-07-11· cited 148×
• Good v. AB Chance Co.
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1977-03-03· cited 62×
• People v. Romero
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1978-12-28· cited 18×
• People v. Stewart
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1977-03-17· cited 17×