People ex rel. O.J.S.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he court has the authority to supplement and modify the opinions it expressed in its oral remarks until the date judgment formally enters.”
• a court may take judicial notice of its own file, its findings of fact, and it s conclusions of law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re S.M-L
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2016-11-17· cited 175×
• In re A.M., Juvenile
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2015-08-28· cited 20×
• In Re Marriage of West
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2004-06-17· cited 17×
• Rocky Mountain Health Maintenance Organization, Inc. v. Colorado Department of Health Care Policy & Financing Ex Rel. Rizzuto
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2001-09-13· cited 13×
• People ex rel. J.W. and N.W
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2016-08-25· cited 3×
• People in Interest of OJS
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1993-02-01
• In re the Marriage of West
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2004-06-17

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, In the Interest of M.M., a Child, and concerning C.M.
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1986-10-20· cited 1,068×
• People ex rel. A. M. D.
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1982-07-19· cited 340×
• B.B. v. People
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1990-01-16· cited 61×
• Losavio v. District Court in & for Tenth Jud. Dist.
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1975-03-24· cited 53×
• Koontz v. Rosener
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1990-01-18· cited 40×
• Denver Post Corp. v. University of Colorado
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1987-03-05· cited 33×
• Hancock v. State, Department of Revenue, Motor Vehicle Division
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1988-07-18· cited 25×
• In Re the Marriage of Hoffner
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1989-07-27· cited 21×
• Sakal v. Donnelly
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1972-01-25· cited 9×