Rocky Mountain Health Maintenance Organization, Inc. v. Colorado Department of Health Care Policy & Financing Ex Rel. Rizzuto

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• For a trial court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law to be adequate for purposes of Rule 52, they must be “sufficiently explicit to give an appellate court a clear understanding of the basis of its order.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).