Skip to main content

People ex rel. C.M.

Citations

  • 116 P.3d 1278
  • 2005 Colo. App. LEXIS 839

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \An order of custody may not be made until after a child has been adjudicated dependent or neglected.\
  • the focus of a permanent legal custody decision is furtherance of a child’s best interests, not a parent’s custodial interest
  • the focus of a permanent legal custody decision is furtherance of a child’s best interests, not a parent’s custodial interest
  • custody orders entered in a dependency or neglect proceeding “are a plan for permanency, subject to change as warranted by the best interests of the child”
  • “[P]arental deficiencies less serious than unfitness may give rise to a compelling reason not to return the child home when considered in light of the child’s physical, mental, and emotional conditions and needs.”
  • “Under the permanency statute, the department must establish a compelling reason why it is not in the [youth’s] best interests to return home before a trial court may award permanent custody of the [youth] to a nonparent.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davidson, Loeb, Vogt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named People ex rel. C.M.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.