Skip to main content

In re R.A.

Citations

  • 121 P.3d 295
  • 2005 Colo. App. LEXIS 525
  • 2005 WL 774465

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “[c]ourts recognize that, in light of the rebuttable nature of the presumption [that fit parents act in their children’s best interests], the ‘special weight’ requirement does not insulate parental wishes from judicial review”
  • applying the presumption in a visitation dispute between fit adoptive parents and the child's paternal grandparents
  • applying the presumption in a visitation dispute between fit adoptive parents and the child’s paternal grandparents

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Casebolt, Dailey, Piccone

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.