District Court of Appeal of Florida· 9/6/2013
Pennington v. State
Citations
- 120 So. 3d 647
- 2013 WL 4764641
- 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 14317
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[T]rial courts are not authorized, on remand after direct appeal, to modify sentences on convictions not disturbed by the appellate court.” (citing Fasenmyer v. State, 457 So.2d 1361, 1365-66 (Fla.1984))
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Orfinger, Palmer, Torpy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Fasenmyer v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1984-09-13· cited 39×
- McKinley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-02-18· cited 15×
- Kelly v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-06-25· cited 12×
- Ruffin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-11-14· cited 12×
- Pennington v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-10-25· cited 2×
- Carlin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-12-30· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.