Lakey v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Because the jury did not make a specific finding of penetration rather than union, it was improper to include points for penetration.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Brooks v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2007-10-25· cited 134×
• Fasenmyer v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1984-09-13· cited 39×
• Mann v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-02-15· cited 6×
• Chatman v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-12-13· cited 4×
• Daniels v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-06-14· cited 1×
• Pennington v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-09-06· cited 1×
• Richards v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-12-02· cited 1×