Pendleton Woolen Mills v. Vending Associates, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• employing both a but-for and a substantial factor test of causation and noting that both had been cited in the past
• the Court did “not believe that the pop machine involved in this case could be considered a ‘dangerous instrumentality’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).