Pendleton v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant has burden of showing applicability of negative exceptions in jurisdictional statutes
• stating “defendant has the burden of showing the applicability of negative exceptions in jurisdictional statutes”
• \The defendant has the burden of showing the applicability of negative exceptions in jurisdictional statutes.\
• “The defendant has the burden of showing the applicability of negative exceptions in jurisdictional statutes.”
• \The defendant has the burden of showing the applicability of negative exceptions in jurisdictional statutes.\
• “The defendant has the burden of showing the applicability of negative exceptions in jurisdictional statutes.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. St. Francis
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1989-04-14· cited 22×
• State v. Verdugo
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1995-01-17· cited 10×
• State v. Smith
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1993-10-27· cited 9×
• Michael Young, Applicant-Appellant v. State of Iowa
  Court of Appeals of Iowa· 2015-02-11
• Tyler Wesley Riggle v. State of Indiana
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2020-07-16

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Miranda v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
• Rhode Island v. Innis
  Supreme Court· 1980-05-12· cited 5,571×
• Brewer v. Williams
  Supreme Court· 1977-05-16· cited 2,626×
• Fort Leavenworth Railroad v. Lowe
  Supreme Court· 1885-05-04· cited 376×
• United States v. Leonard Gliatta
  Fifth Circuit· 1978-09-14· cited 17×
• State v. Mendez
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1936-10-02· cited 11×
• Russell v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1983-04-21· cited 1×