Pelletier v. Main Street Textiles, LP

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that there are some situations where experts are “permitted to testify about the law applicable to the case”
• stating the benches do not allow people “to slide to the sides of each bench segment and allow[] each user a free movement without obstructions or impediments”
• “[I]n general, the customs and practices of an industry are proper subjects for expert testimony.”
• “[I]n general, the customs and practices of an industry are proper subjects for expert 3 testimony.”
• “[I]nstead of [sic] layout from approved plans we found a clustered and overcrowded fixture layout with constraint [sic] circulation paths between fixtures . . . .”
• “The agglomeration and overcrowding at the food court decrease the space available for circulation and creates barriers at table ends dissallowing [sic] access to most accessible seats.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).