Skip to main content
· 4/15/2003

Peet v. Randolph

Citations

  • 103 S.W.3d 872
  • 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 540
  • 2003 WL 1873266

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • where trial court’s dismissal by docket sheet entry did not meet the requirements of Rule 74.01(a

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mooney, Crahan, Blackmar

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.