Berry-Iverson Co. of North Dakota, Inc. v. Johnson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• adopting the reasoning of both the Montana and Iowa Supreme Courts from Weintz and Myers
• adopting the reasoning of both the Montana and Iowa Supreme Courts from Weintz and Myers
• use of land for a radio transmitter tower and associated equipment not an agricultural purpose
• “To conclude [that a decision to sell a larger parcel was not a decision to sell a smaller parcel within it] would ... destroy a bargained-for purchase preemption before the expiration for which such preemption was obtained.”
• “To conclude [that a decision to sell a larger parcel was not a decision to sell a smaller parcel within it] would . . . destroy a bargained-for purchase preemption before the expiration for which such preemption was obtained.”
• “The owners, by failing to provide [the lessee] with an opportunity to exercise its right of first refusal with reference to the sale of the four-acre tract of land, breached their contractual agreement by selling the 390.43-acre farm containing the four-acre tract to the [buyers].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).