Customs and Patent Appeals· 6/10/1976
Peeler v. Miller
Citations
- 535 F.2d 647
- 190 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 117
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a four-year delay in filing a patent application after the invention was perfected was unreasonably long
- implying that intentional suppression requires showing of specific intent
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Baldwin, Lane, Markey, Miller, Rich
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Apotex Usa, Inc. v. Merck & Co., Inc.Federal Circuit· 2001-06-26· cited 76×
- Yoshihiro Fujikawa, Mikio Suzuki, Hiroshi Iwasaki, Mitsuaki Sakashita and Masaki Kitahara v. Sompong Wattanasin, (Two Cases)Federal Circuit· 1996-08-28· cited 70×
- Frank E. Paulik and Robert G. Schultz v. Nabil Rizkalla and Charles N. WinnickFederal Circuit· 1985-04-22· cited 58×
- The Dow Chemical Company v. Astro-Valcour, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2001-09-28· cited 40×
- John H. Bruning v. Ryusho HiroseFederal Circuit· 1998-11-25· cited 30×
- Elmar Bosies and Rudi Gall v. James J. Benedict and Christopher M. PerkinsFederal Circuit· 1994-05-25· cited 22×
- Robert S. Lutzker v. Catherine PletFederal Circuit· 1988-04-06· cited 19×
- Ralston Purina Co. v. Far-Mar-Co, Inc.D. Kansas· 1984-04-18· cited 19×
- Horwath v. LeeCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1977-11-10· cited 18×
- Correge v. MurphyFederal Circuit· 1983-04-20· cited 17×
- Shindelar v. HoldemanCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1980-09-04· cited 15×
- In Re Bruce Charles Farrenkopf and Magdalena Usategui-Gomez, and Travenol Laboratories, Inc., IntervenorFederal Circuit· 1983-07-27· cited 12×
- Breuer v. DeMarinisCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1977-06-30· cited 8×
- Standard Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesCourt of Claims· 1991-12-20· cited 6×
- Infosint, S.A. v. H. Lundbeck A/SS.D. New York· 2009-05-28· cited 1×
- National Presto Industries, Inc. v. Black & Decker (u.s.) Inc., and Better Mousetraps, Inc., Third PartyThird Circuit· 1995-06-20
- Sabasta v. Buckaroos, Inc.S.D. Iowa· 2007-08-31
- In re SuskaCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1979-01-11
- Christiane E, LLC v. International Expeditions, Inc.Trademark Trial and Appeal Board· 2013-05-24
- Allegiance StaffingTrademark Trial and Appeal Board· 2015-07-09
Cites
30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Towne v. EisnerSupreme Court· 1918-01-07· cited 577×
- In re ClarkCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1975-09-25· cited 34×
- Young v. DworkinCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1974-01-17· cited 31×
- Joshua C. Conner v. George G. JorisCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1957-02-21· cited 30×
- Arthur W. Schnick v. Lawrence E. FennCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1960-06-01· cited 29×
- Kenneth L. Berry v. Watt W. Webb, William A. Wissler and William D. ForgengCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1969-06-26· cited 29×
- Heard v. BurtonU.S. Customs Court· 1964-06-25· cited 25×
- Langer v. KaufmanCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1972-09-21· cited 24×
- James A. Patterson and Glenn K. Lissner v. Karl-Heinz HauckCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1965-02-18· cited 23×
- George B. Spero v. Howard J. Ringold and George RosenkranzCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1967-05-25· cited 23×
- Adrian P. Brokaw v. Charles B. VogelCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1970-08-06· cited 21×
- Robert A. Reiners v. Charles L. MehltretterCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1956-09-27· cited 17×
- Robert C. Woofter v. Vernon E. CarlsonCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1967-02-09· cited 17×
- Steinberg v. SeitzCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1975-06-26· cited 16×
- In re McKellinCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1976-01-22· cited 16×
- In Re Plymouth Motor CorporationCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1931-01-12· cited 14×
- Gallagher v. SmithCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1953-09-28· cited 12×
- Vincent J. Frilette and Paul B. Weisz v. Charles Newton Kimberlin, Jr. And Elroy Merle GladrowCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1969-06-26· cited 12×
- Bowers v. ValleyCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1945-04-09· cited 10×
- Lewis E. Walkup v. Harold G. GreigCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1964-06-11· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.