Customs and Patent Appeals· 6/1/1960
Arthur W. Schnick v. Lawrence E. Fenn
Citations
- 277 F.2d 935
- 47 C.C.P.A. 1174
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “mitigating circumstances” included continuing development, after reduction to practice, of best design and tests in further perfecting the invention
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kirkpatrick, Martin, Rich, Smith, William, Worley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Frank E. Paulik and Robert G. Schultz v. Nabil Rizkalla and Charles N. WinnickFederal Circuit· 1985-04-22· cited 58×
- Application of William L. Hartop, Jr., and Edward P. BrandesCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1962-12-12· cited 32×
- Farrand Optical Co., Inc. v. The United States of AmericaSecond Circuit· 1963-11-06· cited 32×
- Young v. DworkinCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1974-01-17· cited 31×
- Peeler v. MillerCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1976-06-10· cited 22×
- Robert S. Lutzker v. Catherine PletFederal Circuit· 1988-04-06· cited 19×
- Edwin H. Land and Meroe M. Morse v. Francis A. Regan, Jr., Seamon A. Lincoln and Donald E. HansonCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1965-03-11· cited 16×
- In re McKellinCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1976-01-22· cited 16×
- Lewis E. Walkup v. Harold G. GreigCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1964-06-11· cited 8×
- James Harding v. Samuel Steingiser and Ival O. SalyerCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1963-06-20· cited 7×
- Davis R. Dewey, II v. Elliott J. LawtonCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1965-07-01· cited 7×
- Gilbert R. Wolter, Alfred F. Ernstberger and Frederick J. Ritter v. Michael E. Belicka, Robert J. Kenny and Rodney LonginCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1969-04-17· cited 7×
- Brown-Bridge Mills, Inc. v. Eastern Fine Paper, Inc.First Circuit· 1983-02-18· cited 7×
- Hradel v. GriffithCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1966-11-17· cited 5×
- HUGHES AIRCRAFT COMPANY v. General Instrument Corp.D. Delaware· 1974-04-23· cited 4×
- Potter Instrument Co., Inc. v. ODEC Computer Systems, Inc.D. Rhode Island· 1974-01-17· cited 3×
- Livia C. Schmierer and Jacques H. F. Valin v. John C. NewtonCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1968-10-10· cited 2×
- Kimberly-Clark Corp. v. Eastern Fine Paper, Inc.D. Maine· 1981-10-28· cited 2×
- Unnamed caseCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1967-02-09
- Unnamed caseFirst Circuit· 1983-02-18
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Atlantic Works v. BradySupreme Court· 1883-03-18· cited 407×
- Hildreth v. MastorasSupreme Court· 1921-11-07· cited 125×
- Field v. Knowles. Field v. KnowlesCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1950-06-30· cited 43×
- Radio Corporation of America and United States of America v. International Standard Electric CorporationThird Circuit· 1956-04-19· cited 36×
- Sinko Tool & Manufacturing Co. v. Automatic Devices Corp.Second Circuit· 1946-11-12· cited 27×
- Tansel v. HigonnetCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1954-09-17· cited 16×
- Lustig v. LegatCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1946-04-01· cited 6×
- Rhinevault v. PfiesterCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1933-05-29· cited 5×
- Van Cleef v. TierneyCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1941-04-14· cited 5×
- Brown v. ChildsCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1941-06-09· cited 3×
- Applegarth v. WilsonCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1946-07-09· cited 3×
- Wheeler v. LintonCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1951-01-16· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.