Pedraza v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that under scheme applicable at the time, period of probation could not exceed maximum term of confinement allowable for offense of conviction
• explaining that under scheme applicable at the time, period of probation could not exceed maximum term of confinement allowable for offense of conviction
• referring to article 42.13, Sec. 3(b) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which provided at the time that in assessing misdemeanor probation the court may \extend the term of the probationary period to any length of time not exceeding the maximum time of confinement allowed by law\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Noris Rogers v. Pearland Indep School District
  Fifth Circuit· 2016-06-28· cited 57×
• Jaynes v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1984-07-11· cited 36×
• Chauncey v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1994-05-11· cited 22×
• Warmoth v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1997-05-15· cited 10×
• State v. Rohrich
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 1990-01-25· cited 10×
• Buddy Vincent Gertz v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2012-08-30
• Opinion No.
  Texas Attorney General Reports· 2006-03-13
• Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
  Texas Attorney General Reports· 2006-07-02
• Lozoya, Mathew David
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2023-03-29