Chauncey v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting Brady argument as to an interview because the argument mischar-acterized the evidence
• recognizing Giglio’s extension of Brady
• witness’s interview, which was not disclosed to the defendant pre-trial, was favorable to the defendant because it could have been used to impeach the witness, see Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S. 150, 154, 92 S.Ct. 763, 766, 31 L.Ed.2d 104 (1972

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).