Peddinghaus v. Peddinghaus

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that Illinois recognizes an independent cause of action for unjust enrichment based on HPI Health Care Services
• holding that unjust enrichment claim alleging fraudulent inducement was based on tort theory
• disagreeing with the contention that “Illinois does not recognize an independent cause of action for unjust enrichment”
• denying summary judgment on unjust enrichment claim despite contract between parties because the unjust enrichment sounded in tort, rather than quasi-contract
• pleading must state each cause of action in a separate count
• pleading must state each cause of action in a separate count

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).