Skip to main content
· 9/29/1995

F.H. Prince & Co. v. Towers Financial Corp.

Citations

  • 656 N.E.2d 142
  • 211 Ill. Dec. 950
  • 275 Ill. App. 3d 792
  • 1995 Ill. App. LEXIS 758

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that plaintiffs forbearance from suit against subsidiary was sufficient consideration to support defendant’s guaranty of defendant’s subsidiary’s preexisting debt
  • holding that plaintiff’s forbearance from suit against subsidiary was sufficient consideration to support defendant’s guaranty of defendant’s subsidiary’s preexisting debt

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gordon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.