PEBBLE LTD. PARTNERSHIP v. Parnell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that proposed regulation that affected only two proposed mines was generally applicable in part because it could apply to future mines
• addressing merits of, and not controlling authority rule for, pre-election challenge under constitutional prohibition against special legislation
• addressing merits of, and not controlling authority rule for, pre-election challenge under constitutional prohibition against special legislation
• noting sequence of June oral argument and July dispositive order in September 2009 decision on pre-election challenge to initiative
• noting sequence of June oral argument and July dispositive order in September 2009 decision on pre-election challenge to initiative
• rejecting Pebble's argument that proposed clean water initiative would be unlawful special legislation despite current application only to Pebble project and one other mine

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).