City of Kenai v. Friends of the Recreation Center, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiff was prevailing party for attorney's fee purposes because it obtained preliminary injunction even though it agreed that claims were moot
• noting that when reviewing grant of injunction, questions of pure law are reviewed de novo
• noting in dicta that testimony of staff attorney for Disability Law Center of Alaska, Inc. may inform interpretation of statute
• noting that professional occupations often have licensing requirements
• noting that professional occupations often have licensing requirements
• “[Q]uestions underlying the preliminary injunction are reviewed under the appropriate standard of review. Thus, for example . . . issues of pure law are subject to independent review.” (quoting People ex rel. Gallo v. Acuna, 929 P.2d 596, 626 (Cal. 1997))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).