Peay v. Peay

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Notwithstanding our rule that custody will not be changed without a showing of a change of conditions, to which rule we adhere, the lower comb may upon application determine if the best interest of the child is being served.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Cook v. Cobb
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1978-06-22· cited 72×
• Moore v. Moore
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1989-07-31· cited 55×
• Hofer v. St. Clair
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1989-07-10· cited 49×
• McAlister v. Patterson
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1982-12-21· cited 40×
• Collins v. Collins
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1984-12-10· cited 16×
• Buffkin v. Strickland
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1984-02-10· cited 9×
• Green v. Loveday
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1978-03-20· cited 8×
• Glanton v. Glanton
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1994-04-25· cited 5×
• Harrison v. Ballington
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1998-02-23· cited 4×
• Hogan v. Platts
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1993-05-03· cited 4×
• Peay v. Peay
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1973-06-06· cited 1×
• Shull v. Shull
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1974-07-03

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ford v. Ford
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1963-05-06· cited 27×
• Mincey v. Mincey
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1954-02-01· cited 26×
• Pullen v. Pullen
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1969-08-18· cited 21×
• Powell v. Powell
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1971-05-03· cited 17×
• Moorhead v. Scott
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1972-12-13· cited 13×
• Powell v. Powell
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1957-05-30· cited 7×