Skip to main content
· 7/10/1989

Hofer v. St. Clair

Citations

  • 381 S.E.2d 736
  • 298 S.C. 503
  • 1989 S.C. LEXIS 145

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • utilizing a contract standard of review and stating that lower court's factual findings on the existence of a partnership were supported by the record
  • finding sufficient evidence of a partnership where two people owned property as joint tenants, one referred to the other as “partner,” and they issued a business card with both names on it
  • The admission of evidence is within the sound discretion of the trial court, and absent a clear abuse of discretion, the trial court’s ruling will not be disturbed on appeal.
  • the admission or exclusion of evidence is within the trial court’s discretion
  • under former appellate rules also applicable to the case at bar
  • under former appellate rules also applicable to the case at bar

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Toal, Gregory, Harwell, Chandler, Finney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.