· 7/10/1989
Hofer v. St. Clair
Citations
- 381 S.E.2d 736
- 298 S.C. 503
- 1989 S.C. LEXIS 145
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- utilizing a contract standard of review and stating that lower court's factual findings on the existence of a partnership were supported by the record
- finding sufficient evidence of a partnership where two people owned property as joint tenants, one referred to the other as “partner,” and they issued a business card with both names on it
- The admission of evidence is within the sound discretion of the trial court, and absent a clear abuse of discretion, the trial courts ruling will not be disturbed on appeal.
- the admission or exclusion of evidence is within the trial court’s discretion
- under former appellate rules also applicable to the case at bar
- under former appellate rules also applicable to the case at bar
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Toal, Gregory, Harwell, Chandler, Finney
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.