Pearson v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “mere salutations” do not fall within the meaning of “to converse with a juror”
• Ex parte statements made by jurors do not constitute a “conversation” so as to invoke Art. 36.22
• Ex parte statements made by jurors do not constitute a “conversation” so as to invoke Article 36.22
• one juror walked twenty or twenty-five feet away to buy newspaper while in the view of the deputy sheriff
• one juror walked twenty or twenty-five feet away to buy newspaper while in the view of the deputy sheriff

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Chambliss v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1983-02-16· cited 106×
• Palasota v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1970-10-28· cited 43×
• Hood v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1992-01-08· cited 31×
• Mayo v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1986-04-30· cited 28×
• Skillern v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1977-12-21· cited 24×
• Goodall v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1973-11-21· cited 19×
• James Otis O'Bryant v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2014-06-26· cited 1×
• Lorenzo Lewis v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 1997-08-14
• Darin Dawantay Fullilove v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 1999-02-19
• John Franklin Neill v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2002-07-26
• Ismael Caso Jr. A/K/A Ismael Caso v. the State of Texas
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2024-08-08

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Parker v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1934-12-19· cited 2×