Palasota v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where no proof after filing of sworn motion showed that defendant was eligible for probation, “the court should not, as it did, have submitted the issue of probation”
• where no proof after filing of sworn motion showed that defendant was eligible for probation, “the court should not, as it did, have submitted the issue of probation”
• trial court did not err in denying motion for continuance when motion for continuance alleged only that “facts which this defendant expects to prove by said witness are, in substance, facts which will verify the defendant acted in self defense”
• because juror did not respond to remarks of unidentified woman asking how jurors could “sleep at night” and that “damned jury ought to be shot between the eyes,” such remarks did not constitute “conversation” under article 36.22

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).