Pearson v. Barnhart

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a contrary determination would “otherwise render SSR 96-8p meaningless”
• reversing the ALJ’s ruling because the ALJ failed to specify how much time in a work day the plaintiff could perform the seven exertional factors

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).