Skip to main content

Peake v. State

Citations

  • 792 S.W.2d 456
  • 1990 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 127
  • 1990 WL 87018

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Since we have determined appellant failed to preserve any error for review, the court of appeals erred in addressing any harm from this alleged error.”
  • “[A] preliminary statement by the State as to what it expects to prove at trial is proper . . . .”
  • “[A] preliminary statement by the State as to what it expects to prove at trial is proper . . . .”
  • defendant failed to preserve error regarding prosecutor’s erroneous opening statement referencing evidence that was later ruled inadmissible because defendant failed to object or move for mistrial on that basis when such error became apparent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Miller, Clinton, Teague

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.