Skip to main content

Citations

  • 483 N.E.2d 1094
  • 396 Mass. 68
  • 1985 Mass. LEXIS 1758

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[D]enying the [putative father] a right to litigate his paternity * * * does not violate [his] right to due process.”
  • “[T]hose constitutional principles [the equal protection clause and Massachusetts’ Equal Rights Amendment] do not apply in this case because the described classifications are not gender-based”
  • “Stanley v. Illinois * * * does not require, that, in all circumstances, a man claiming to be the father of a child conceived while the child’s mother is married to another man is constitutionally entitled to be heard on the question of paternity.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.