A v. X, Y, AND Z

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding statute that conferred putative father no standing to challenge paternity of a child born in wedlock did not deny due process or equal protection
• holding statute that conferred putative father no standing to challenge paternity of a child born in wedlock did not deny due process or equal protection
• “The government function in this case * * * far outweighs the private interest of [the putative father]”
• “If the classification can be said to be gender based * * * it is not invidious but only realistically reflects the fact that sexes are not similarly situated in these circumstances. * * * And, it is proper under any of the standards applied to it”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).