Skip to main content

Payne v. State

Citations

  • 838 N.E.2d 503
  • 2005 Ind. App. LEXIS 2267
  • 2005 WL 3291245

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the defendant’s criminal history deserved significant aggravating weight given the number of offenses, the proximity in time of the offenses, and the defendant’s similar prior convictions
  • observing that we should avoid construing the credit-time statutes as permitting a defendant to claim “double or extra credit” for presentence confinement
  • noting that a guilty plea can demonstrate a defendant’s acceptance of responsibility but that pleading guilty in exchange for the dismissal of several serious charges can lessen its mitigating weight
  • impermissible “double” credit occurs when a defendant is given credit twice for the same period of pre-sentencing confinement
  • Payne not entitled to credit against sentences to be served consecutively

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barnes, Najam, Crone

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.