Skip to main content
· 12/31/2019

Randall Ray Kratzer v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that because the Marshals Service does not own or operate any detention facilities, it places those in its custody in facilities run by other entities
  • holding that a reasonable jury could find that a prison’s detention of a man for 355 days without arraignment, 20 while ignoring his pleas for counsel or a court appearance, constituted extreme and outrageous conduct for IIED purposes
  • holding that a reasonable jury could find that a prison’s detention of a man for 355 days without arraignment, 20 while ignoring his pleas for counsel or a court appearance, constituted extreme and outrageous conduct for IIED purposes
  • noting Rivera’s argument that CoreCivic’s lack of action prolonged his 28 detention

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.