Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1/27/2009

Payne v. Payne

Citations

674 S.E.2d 515
382 S.C. 62
2009 S.C. App. LEXIS 19

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding the family court did not abuse its discretion by equally splitting the GAL fees between the parties
stating that \issues not raised and ruled upon by the trial court will not be considered on appeal\
finding mother failed to preserve issue relating to guardian ad litem’s custody recommendation by not objecting when the guardian gave her recommendation to the family court
stating to be preserved for appellate review, an issue must have been raised to and ruled upon by the trial judge, and issues not raised and ruled upon in the trial court will not be considered on appeal
finding the mother's issue that the family court failed to set forth in the record the specific grounds for requesting the GAL's custody recommendation was not preserved because the mother did not object when the GAL gave her recommendation
\Issues not raised and ruled upon in the [family] court will not be considered on appeal.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hearn, Short, Konduros

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.