Skip to main content
· 11/5/2001

Payne v. Overhead Door Corp.

Citations

  • 172 F. Supp. 2d 475
  • 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18748
  • 2001 WL 1456109

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “the majority of courts interpret ‘consent’ to mean that each defendant must submit written consent unambiguously agreeing to removal”
  • “[T]he removal statute has consistently been interpreted to require that all defendants consent to removal within the thirty day period, known as the ‘Rule of Unanimity.’” (citing Berrios v. Our Lady of Mercy Med. Ctr., No. 99 Civ. 21(DLC
  • “[T]he removal statute has consistently been interpreted to require that all defendants consent to removal within the thirty day period, known as the ‘Rule of Unanimity.’” (citing Berrios v. Our Lady of Mercy Med. Ctr., No. 99 Civ. 21(DLC

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McMahon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.