Pavano v. Shalala

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding claim not collateral where “Plaintiffs were not challenging the validity of agency regulations, but challenging the application of regulations to them.”
• “[T]he issue [the] [p]laintiffs raise in their suit is not collateral to their demand for . . . benefits. . . . The issue in suit is identical to the administrative demand. By their suits [the] [p]laintiffs are . . . not seeking relief other than that sought in the administrative proceeding.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).