James Bastek v. Federal Crop Insurance Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an exhaustion requirement premised on a combination of statutory and regulatory provisions was mandatory and thus not subject to judicially created exceptions
• “Only in the absence of an explicit statutory exhaustion requirement may courts exercise discretion.... ”
• “Common law (or ‘judicial’) exhaustion doctrine ... recognizes judicial discretion to employ a broad array of exceptions.”
• “Statutory exhaustion requirements are mandatory, and courts are not free to dispense with them.”
• noting the distinction between statutory and judicial exhaustion requirements
• noting the distinction between statutory and judicial exhaustion requirements

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).