Paul v. Imperial Palace, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that it was not improper for counsel to suggest in closing argument that a general, arbitrary amount, $200,000, would recompense the plaintiff for future damages in pain and suffering
• reviewing a district court's decision to admit lay witness testimony for an abuse of discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).