Sprague v. Lucky Stores, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that summary judgment is improper when \a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party\
• stating that in general, whether an owner or occupant of property was under constructive notice of a hazardous condition, is a question of fact properly left for the jury
• “[A] business owes its patrons a duty to keep the premises in a reasonably safe condition 5 for use.”
• “[A] business owes its patrons a duty to keep the premises in a reasonably safe condition 25 for use.”
• “The owner or occupant of property is not an insurer of the 9 safety of a person on the premises, and in the absence of negligence, no liability 10 lies.”
• where foreign substance causing patron to slip and fall results from actions of persons other than business or its employees, business is liable only if it had actual or constructive notice of condition and failed to remedy it

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).