PATSY CUSTER v. WAL-MART STORES EAST I, LP, Defendant-Respondent.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• setting forth deposition testimony as purported material facts does not satisfy Rule 74.04;' such is not a statement of material facts, and doing so simply forced the opponent into a “useless exercise” of denying or admitting that the deposition was quoted accurately

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).