Patrick v. Rice

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the return of mailed notice did not mean that the correct address was not reason- ably ascertainable and voiding the tax sale in which the property at issue was sold
• \Determining that the division complied with applicable notice statutes resolves only half the question on appeal.... [T]he notice of such [sale] must comply with minimum due process standards\
• “Determining that the division complied with applicable notice statutes resolves only half the question on appeal. . . . [T]he notice of such [sale] must comply with minimum due process standards”
• due process requires that reasonable diligent efforts be made to notify those individuals holding a property interest who are reasonably ascertainable
• “The circumstances surrounding the aseertainability of the address, such as the existence of electricity service to the cabin or whether plaintiffs gave their change of address to the county, are questions of fact.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).