Skip to main content

Paschall v. State

Citations

  • 8 P.3d 851
  • 116 Nev. 911
  • 116 Nev. Adv. Rep. 99
  • 2000 Nev. LEXIS 109

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declining to bar collateral attack because Custis “merely established the floor for federal constitutional purposes”
  • declining to bar collateral attack because Custis “merely established the floor for federal constitutional purposes”
  • declining to bar collateral attack because Custis “merely established the floor for federal constitutional purposes”
  • declining to bar collateral attack because Custis “merely established the floor for federal constitutional purposes”
  • neither accepting nor rejecting Custis, but noting that it is not bound by that decision and declining to adopt a strict limitation on collateral attacks

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rose, Young, Leavitt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.