State v. Glusman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that the contracts clause protects constitutionally vested rights unless police power concerns of the state render interference reasonably necessary
• recognizing that the contracts clause protects constitutionally vested rights unless police power concerns of the state render interference reasonably necessary
• stating that “statutes should be construed, if reasonably possible, so as to be in harmony with the constitution”
• Gaming statute providing that any person or entity that does business on premises occupied by specified, licensed gaming business may be required to apply for determination of suitability held .constitutional.
• “It is, however, within the inherent discretion of this Court to consider issues of substantial public importance which are likely to recur, in spite of any intervening event during the pendency of an appeal which has rendered the matter moot.”
• “It is, however, within the inherent discretion of this Court to consider issues of sub- stantial public importance which are likely to recur, in spite of any intervening event during the pendency of an appeal which has rendered the matter moot.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).