Skip to main content

Parson v. Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Co.

Citations

  • 514 N.W.2d 891
  • 1994 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 102
  • 1994 WL 138704

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • focusing on the existence of a contract of hire as shown by the parties’ intent, stating it was unnecessary to consider five factors from Henderson
  • stating that when loaned employees are required to use separate break rooms, are prohibited from using cafeteria and locker room, and are prohibited from joining company labor association, these facts infer special employer did not intend to enter contract of hire with loaned employee
  • outlining whether any facts indicated loaned employee or special employer intended not to enter into contract of hire, in order to determine whether summary judgment for special employer should be reversed
  • explaining the contract between the broker and customer could evidence the customer’s intent to not enter into an employment relationship with the employee
  • fact issue whether employees of labor broker could be deemed employees of broker’s client precluded summary judgment dismissal
  • no express contract; strong evidence special employer did not intend to employ; summary judgment for employer reversed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McGiverin, Harris, Neuman, Andreasen, Ternus

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.