Seventh Circuit· 2/13/1985
Parks v. Pavkovic
Citations
- 753 F.2d 1397
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- allowing imme‐ diate appeal when “only a ‘ministerial’ task remains for the district court to perform”
- affirming district court's permanent injunction against the state of Illinois, which required the state to cover the full cost of related services provided to special-needs students and enjoined the state from requiring any parental contribution thereto.
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Krakauer v. Dish Network, L. L.C.Fourth Circuit· 2019-05-30· cited 219×
- Sheely v. MRI Radiology Network, P.A.Eleventh Circuit· 2007-11-07· cited 167×
- HSBC Bank USA v. Kirkland TownsendSeventh Circuit· 2015-07-16· cited 31×
- Michael Holland v. Bibeau Construction CompanyD.C. Circuit· 2014-12-16· cited 27×
- James M. Alex v. City of Chicago, Michael M. McKittrick v. City of ChicagoSeventh Circuit· 1994-07-21· cited 21×
- Dennis Morgan and Louise Morgan v. United StatesSecond Circuit· 1992-06-25· cited 13×
- Kevin McCabe v. Caribbean Cruise Line, IncorpoSeventh Circuit· 2018-07-24· cited 13×
- Gates v. ToweryN.D. Illinois· 2006-10-16· cited 9×
- Dual-Temp of Illinois, Inc. v. Hench Control, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 2015-01-23· cited 6×
- Fisher v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 1993-06-02· cited 4×
- Lucio v. Safe Auto InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals· 2010-06-01· cited 4×
- Perficient v. Thomas MunleyEighth Circuit· 2022-08-09· cited 4×
- Marshall Joint School District No. 2 v. C.D. Ex Rel. BrianW.D. Wisconsin· 2009-01-08· cited 3×
- Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Illinois Mine Subsidence Insurance FundSeventh Circuit· 2025-06-02· cited 2×
- Pauly v. U.S. Department of AgricultureNinth Circuit· 2003-11-13· cited 1×
- Goodman v. LeeFifth Circuit· 1993-04-15
- Ty, Incorporated v. Publications Int'lSeventh Circuit· 2002-05-30
- Primax Recoveries v. Sevilla, RichardSeventh Circuit· 2003-04-01
- Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Illinois Mine Subsidence Insurance FundSeventh Circuit· 2025-06-10
Cites
61 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court· 1979-01-09· cited 4,229×
- Quern v. JordanSupreme Court· 1979-03-05· cited 4,123×
- Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley Ex Rel. RowleySupreme Court· 1982-06-28· cited 2,878×
- University of Texas v. CamenischSupreme Court· 1981-04-29· cited 2,376×
- Sosna v. IowaSupreme Court· 1975-01-14· cited 2,006×
- United States Parole Commission v. GeraghtySupreme Court· 1980-03-19· cited 1,936×
- Fitzpatrick v. BitzerSupreme Court· 1976-06-28· cited 1,679×
- Brandon v. HoltSupreme Court· 1985-01-21· cited 1,538×
- Southeastern Community College v. DavisSupreme Court· 1979-06-11· cited 1,381×
- Phelps Dodge Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court· 1941-04-28· cited 1,282×
- Abood v. Detroit Board of EducationSupreme Court· 1977-06-27· cited 1,173×
- Smith v. RobinsonSupreme Court· 1984-07-05· cited 994×
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. WetzelSupreme Court· 1976-03-23· cited 988×
- Boeing Co. v. Van GemertSupreme Court· 1980-02-19· cited 897×
- Pasadena City Board of Education v. SpanglerSupreme Court· 1976-06-28· cited 457×
- Board of School Comm'rs of Indianapolis v. JacobsSupreme Court· 1975-02-18· cited 368×
- Switzerland Cheese Assn., Inc. v. E. Horne's Market, Inc.Supreme Court· 1966-11-07· cited 354×
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,265 Fred Zeidman and Steven Youngelson v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., Inc.Fifth Circuit· 1981-07-27· cited 327×
- Kershner v. MazurkiewiczThird Circuit· 1982-02-01· cited 237×
- Max I. Bittner v. Sadoff & Rudoy IndustriesSeventh Circuit· 1984-03-09· cited 223×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.