Michael Holland v. Bibeau Construction Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reasoning that failure to adequately plead an element constitutes 14 “an independent basis” on which to affirm dismissal of a securities fraud complaint
• requiring allegations of loss causation to satisfy Federal Rule of Civil 17 Procedure 9(b)’s heightened “particularity” requirement
• “Interest merely equalizes the time value of money, making the same amount similarly valuable when paid at different times.”
• “The 6 text [of 29 U.S.C. § 1132(g)(2)] admits of no exceptions, and the district court awarded the Plan 7 double interest on the unpaid premiums within the limitations period.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).