Skip to main content

Parker v. State

Citations

  • 662 N.E.2d 994
  • 1996 Ind. App. LEXIS 340
  • 1996 WL 135470

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that reasonable suspicion was present when the informant was known to the officer and had provided reliable information in the past
  • providing that officer had reasonable suspicion to stop and pat-down individual because officer knew that the area was known for frequent drug activity, and that firearms were frequently present in drug transactions
  • providing that officer had reasonable suspicion to stop and pat- down individual because officer knew that the area was known for frequent drug activity, and that firearms were frequently present in drug transactions
  • providing that 22 officer had reasonable suspicion to stop and pat-down individual because officer knew that the area was known for frequent drug activity, and that firearms were frequently present in drug transactions
  • “Based on the informant’s tip, he believed that narcotics would be present. . . . [The officer] knew . . . that firearms were frequently present in drug transactions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kirsch, Robertson, Sullivan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.