Skip to main content

Parker v. State

Citations

  • 697 N.E.2d 1265
  • 1998 Ind. App. LEXIS 1188
  • 1998 WL 395160

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reversing conviction because evidence was seized illegally even though court had earlier affirmed denial of motion to suppress in an inter- locutory appeal
  • declining to apply the law-of-the-case doctrine to issue of propriety of search and seizure where prior case was based on evidence submitted in pre-trial motion to dismiss, whereas the case at bar was based on additional evidence presented during trial
  • declining to apply the law-of-the-case doctrine to issue of propriety of search and seizure where prior case was based on evidence submitted in pre-trial motion to dismiss, whereas the case at bar was based on additional evidence presented during trial
  • the doctrine’s purpose is “to minimize unnecessary relitigation of legal issues once they have been resolved by an appellate court”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kirsch, Sullivan, Baker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.