Skip to main content
Second Circuit· 1/23/2012

Parker v. Ercole

Citations

  • 666 F.3d 830
  • 2012 WL 171493
  • 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 1239

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • court need not address both prongs if a petitioner makes an insufficient showing on one
  • court need not address both prongs if a petitioner makes an insufficient showing on one
  • court need not address both prongs if a petitioner makes an insufficient showing on one
  • “for where ‘it is easier to dispose of an ineffectiveness claim on the ground of lack of sufficient prejudice [than on the ground of objectively unreasonable performance] . . . that course should be followed.”
  • “Parker must show that, but for his counsel’s failure to preserve his sufficiency claim, there is a reasonable probability that the claim would have been considered on appeal and, as a result, his conviction would have been reversed.” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kearse, McLaughlin, Cabranes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Parker v. Ercole

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.