Skip to main content
· 2/9/2012

Garbutt v. Conway

Citations

  • 668 F.3d 79
  • 2012 WL 400701
  • 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 2557

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting sufficiency claim because jury could have inferred from fact that defendant ran away without ascertaining if victim had died that he had not intended to kill her
  • “We review collateral challenges to the sufficiency of the evidence supporting a state-court jury’s verdict under a doubly deferential standard of review.”
  • a legal sufficiency claim on federal habeas review is “doubly deferential”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hall, Lynch, Chin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.