Supreme Court of Georgia· 3/4/2019
Park v. State
Citations
- 825 S.E.2d 147
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that Georgia’s SBM program is not “divorced from the State’s general interest in law enforcement” and therefore does not come within the scope of the special needs exception
- holding that a statute requiring persons designated as “sexually dangerous predators” be subjected to GPS monitoring for life, even after offenders had completed their entire sentence and had their privacy rights restored, facially violated the Fourth Amendment
- “It cannot be said that an individual who has completed the entirety of his or her criminal sentence, including his or her parole and/or probation requirements, would have the same diminished privacy expectations as an individual who is still serving his or her sentence.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Blackwell, Melton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. GradySupreme Court of North Carolina· 2019-08-16· cited 80×
- State v. W. SmithMontana Supreme Court· 2021-06-08· cited 23×
- Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1980-12-01· cited 17×
- Steve Burgess v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2019-03-14· cited 2×
- People v KardaszMichigan Supreme Court· 2025-12-19
Cites
26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 10,835×
- Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court· 1989-03-21· cited 2,560×
- Griffin v. WisconsinSupreme Court· 1987-06-26· cited 2,149×
- United States v. KnightsSupreme Court· 2001-12-10· cited 1,478×
- Vernonia School District 47J v. ActonSupreme Court· 1995-06-26· cited 1,470×
- United States v. JonesSupreme Court· 2012-01-23· cited 1,330×
- City of Indianapolis v. EdmondSupreme Court· 2000-11-28· cited 1,205×
- National Treasury Employees Union v. Von RaabSupreme Court· 1989-03-21· cited 1,188×
- Samson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 2006-06-19· cited 982×
- Chandler v. MillerSupreme Court· 1997-04-15· cited 524×
- Ferguson v. City of CharlestonSupreme Court· 2001-03-21· cited 523×
- City of L. A. v. PatelSupreme Court· 2015-06-22· cited 240×
- Nicholas v. GoordSecond Circuit· 2005-11-28· cited 223×
- Grady v. North CarolinaSupreme Court· 2015-03-30· cited 197×
- Michael Belleau v. Edward WallSeventh Circuit· 2016-01-29· cited 52×
- People v. HallakMichigan Court of Appeals· 2015-05-28· cited 50×
- State v. GriffinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina· 2018-08-07· cited 28×
- JIG Real Estate, LLC v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia· 2011-07-05· cited 27×
- Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2007-10-29· cited 22×
- Coen v. CDC Software Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia· 2018-06-29· cited 21×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.