Parhms v. B & B VENTURES, INC.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a contract will not be read as violative of the usury laws unless by its \express and positive terms\ it evinces an intent to exact more interest than allowed by statute
• stating that a contract will not be read as violative of the usury laws unless by its “express and positive terms” it evinces an intent to exact more interest than allowed by statute
• stating that a contract will not be read as violative of the usury laws unless by its \express and positive terms\ it evinces an intent to exact more interest than allowed by statute
• stating that a contract will not be read as violative of the usury laws unless by its \express and positive terms\ it evinces an intent to exact more interest than allowed by statute
• stating that a contract will not be read as violative of the usury laws unless by its “express and positive terms” it evinces an intent to exact more interest than allowed by statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).