Court of Appeals of Maryland· 4/21/1980
Pappas v. Pappas
Citations
- 413 A.2d 549
- 287 Md. 455
- 1980 Md. LEXIS 168
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “A court may not under the guise of interpretation insert or omit words to make a statute express an intention not evidenced in its original form.”
- “A court may not under the guise of interpretation insert or omit words to make a statute express an intention not evidenced in its original form.”
- “Orders for the payment of alimony or child support are not expressly covered by the statute. However, our cases make clear that such orders are orders ‘[f]or ... the payment of money’ under § 12-303.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Murphy, Smith, Digges, Eldridge, Cole, Davidson, Rodowsky
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
44 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Harris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1993-06-28· cited 139×
- Harris v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1987-08-05· cited 99×
- Thornton v. GambleNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1984-09-11· cited 96×
- Sigma Reproductive Health Center v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1983-11-22· cited 90×
- East v. GilchristCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1982-05-20· cited 74×
- State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1993-08-26· cited 65×
- Hartless v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-08-26· cited 52×
- New Jersey Ex Rel. Lennon v. StrazzellaCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1993-07-22· cited 51×
- Frey v. FreyCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1984-02-23· cited 49×
- McElroy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1993-01-19· cited 49×
- Haupt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1995-11-14· cited 41×
- Department of Public Safety & Correctional Services v. LeVanCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1980-09-15· cited 40×
- Planning Board v. MortimerCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1987-09-22· cited 39×
- Cant v. BartlettCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1982-02-09· cited 36×
- COUNTY EXEC., PRINCE GEO'S CTY. v. DoeCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1984-08-20· cited 34×
- Snowden v. Baltimore Gas & Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1984-08-22· cited 33×
- Maryland Port Administration v. John W. Brawner Contracting Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1985-05-13· cited 31×
- Lewis v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1981-04-22· cited 30×
- Anthony Plumbing of Maryland, Inc. v. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1983-11-30· cited 28×
- Smith v. LEAD IND. ASS'N, INC.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2005-04-04· cited 28×
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. MacKeySupreme Court· 1956-06-11· cited 986×
- Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. v. Los Angeles Rams Football Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1978-11-27· cited 93×
- Eastgate Associates v. ApperCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1976-02-03· cited 93×
- Harden v. Mass Transit AdministrationCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1976-04-09· cited 88×
- Biro v. SchombertCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1979-06-07· cited 66×
- Diener Enterprises, Inc. v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1972-10-18· cited 63×
- Funger v. Mayor of SomersetCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1966-10-12· cited 46×
- Lang v. CattertonCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1972-12-07· cited 38×
- Bartell v. BartellCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1976-05-25· cited 33×
- Concannon v. State Roads CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1962-12-05· cited 28×
- Ricketts v. RickettsCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1846-06-15· cited 23×
- Rohrback v. RohrbackCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1892-02-04· cited 21×
- Pettit v. PettitAppellate Court of Illinois· 1978-05-26· cited 18×
- In Re Marriage of LentzAppellate Court of Illinois· 1979-06-21· cited 12×
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. KlauberCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1979-01-18· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.